Servants or masters? Neither
At the end of an otherwise decent article in the Guardian , George Irvin trips over one of the oldest cliches in the left-wing rhetorical manual: Most important, we have not begun to question seriously whether placating the financial markets by means of such cuts is unavoidable. Perhaps it's time to start thinking the unthinkable: namely, that financial markets should be our servants, not our masters. This is a stupid distinction to draw, because markets are neither servant nor master of anybody. They are a place where people (or countries) can choose to go, and where we can each decide on our own participation within the structures available. Greece (more precisely, the people who run its exchequer) can choose whether to borrow money on the international markets. If it wants to, it enters into a two-sided arrangement with consenting investors on terms that both are happy with. If it then wants to default, it does have that option. Exercising that option will bring consequence...