Surprised at the WSJ

The Wall Street Journal today says that the UK government
"...has already spent £600 billion on its financial bailout"
This is simply misleading. The government has made a lot of liquidity available in exchange for other assets through several Bank of England schemes. It has barely spent anything at all; even if you include the bank recapitalisations, which are also in exchange for equity, the figure is around 5% of the number quoted.

While this kind of stuff is to be expected from the Daily Mail and other tabloids, I am pretty surprised at it in the Wall Street Journal. I'm glad that the FT still maintains a standard of reporting that allows us to rely on its interpretations as well as its raw facts.


Popular posts from this blog

Is bad news for the Treasury good for the private sector?

What is the difference between cognitive economics and behavioural finance?

Dead rats and dopamine - a new publication